Home > 2012 > January
SHARE:

Release of Budget Reports (Health)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

ATLANTA – According to the report, the governor’s budget recommendations for FY 2013 increase state General Funds to the Department of Community Health (DCH); however, the increase is misleading. The bulk of the new funding restores funding originally diverted from the DCH budget in FY 2011 and FY 2012. Excluding the restored funding, the FY 2013 budget increases by $56.4 million which represents only a 2.7 percent increase.

FY 2013 Budget Highlights

The FY 2013 budget:

  • Restores $77.5 million originally diverted to the SHBP in FY 2012 and adds $82.2 million to the Medicaid and PeachCare programs to fund the 12th monthly capitation payment in FY 2013.
  • Adds $26.3 million for projected enrollment and cost increases.
  • Adds $8 million to allow eligible children of state employees to enroll in the PeachCare program (generating state savings in the State Health Benefit Plan (SHBP).
  • Adds $4.7 million to increase reimbursement rates for providers serving the PeachCare program.

Download the full report.

 

Media Contact:
Utoia Wooten
uwooten@gbpi.org
404.420.1324 ext. 109

 

###

About the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute

GBPI is the state’s leading independent, nonpartisan nonprofit engaged in research and education about the fiscal and economic health of the state of Georgia. GBPI provides reliable , timely analysis of Georgia’s budget and tax policies, and promotes greater state government fiscal accountability, improved services and an enhanced quality of life for all Georgians.

 

FY 2013 Budget Analysis: Community Health

The governor’s budget recommendations for FY 2013 increase state General Funds to the Department of Community Health (DCH); however, the increase is misleading. The bulk of the new funding restores funding originally diverted from the DCH budget in FY 2011 and FY 2012.

Download PDF.

 

 

FY 2013 Budget Analysis: Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities

 

The governor’s FY 2013 budget recommendations increase state General Funds to the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (DBHDD) by $45.3 million (5.1 percent) compared to FY 2012. The bulk of this increase funds the continued implementation of the Department of Justice (DOJ) Settlement Agreement reached in 2010. In addition to addressing the DOJ Settlement, the FY 2013 budget increases funding for forensic services, increased employer contributions for state employee health and retirement costs, and to reflect a lower federal Medicaid matching rate in FY 2013.

Download PDF.

 

Related Materials:

State Adds Funding for Mental Health and Developmental Disability Programs

Governor’s Proposed Health Budgets

 

 

 

 

FY 2013 Budget Analysis: Public Health

Funding for the new Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH) began in FY 2012. The agency houses public health programs and activities that were previously embedded in other state agencies. For FY 2013, the governor’s budget recommendations increase state support to DPH compared to FY 2012, however, the new funds primarily pay for higher health care and retirement contributions for state employees.

Even with a slight increase in FY 2013, Georgia’s public health programs will still operate with fewer state funds than in the pre-recession budget of FY 2009. When looking at the 11 non-administrative public health programs that make up the current Department of Public Health, the FY 2013 budget reveals a $17.8-million cut—more than 9 percent— in combined General Fund and Tobacco Settlement support from FY 2009.

Although the FY 2013 budget largely fails to restore years of programmatic funding cuts, it does restore more than $400,000 to the state health lab for sexually transmitted disease (STD) testing that was originally cut in FY 2012.

Download PDF.

 

Related Materials:

FY 2013 Budget Analysis: Budget Overview

 

FY 2013 Budget Analysis: Human Services

The governor’s FY 2013 budget recommends $2.8 million less in state General Funds compared to FY 2012. Secondly, there are shifts in state funds for program transfers in and out of the Georgia Department of Human Services (DHS) budget to cover administrative expenses ($11 million) and replace federal TANF funds ($20.5 million).

The FY 2013 budget does not include any state funds to restore the 23.8-percent cuts that DHS experienced from FY 2009 through FY 2012. In addition, the projected loss of $37.3 million in federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) funds will take DHS to a new low.

Download PDF

 

 

Weekly Legislative Update, January 27, 2012

 

This Week in the Georgia Legislature

State Revenues
House and Senate Calendar
State Budget: FY2012 Amended and FY 2013
Fiscal and Tax Policy
Drug Testing of Applicants for Public Assistance

 

State Revenues

State revenues for the first six months of this fiscal year are running 5.2 percent ahead of the FY 2011 revenue collections.

The governor’s FY 2012 revenue estimate projects an increase in revenues of 4.5 percent. Although we appear to be on target to make the revenue estimate, revenues would need to grow between 7 and 8 percent of the remaining 6 months of the fiscal year to drive a surplus large enough to fund the Education Mid-Year Reserve and grow the Revenue Shortfall Reserve by $300 to $400 million.

The FY 2013 revenue estimate is a modest 4.9- percent growth over the FY 2012 revenue estimate. However, to fund the Education Mid-Year Reserve and drive a surplus of $300 to $400 million in FY 2013 to continue rebuilding the Revenue Shortfall Reserve, revenues would need to grow between 7 and 8 percent.  Back to top

 

House and Senate Calendar 

The House and Senate are scheduled to go into session for the 10th legislative day on Monday, January 30th. They will be in session this week through Thursday, February 2nd (13th legislative day).  The legislative calendar is set through Monday, March 12th (31st legislative day).  Back to top

 

State Budget: Amended FY 2012 and FY 2013

Process
Governor Deal released his proposed budgets on January 11, 2012. The House and Senate appropriations subcommittees held budget hearings last week and  will continue to meet throughout the week on the Amended FY 2012 Budget. (Download the proposed budgets.)

 
GBPI Analysis

For the first time in several years there are no dramatic cuts in the governor’s budget recommendations. Even with new spending and an increase of $930 million in General Funds from last year, the FY 2013 budget is still nearly $2 billion less than the pre-recession budget of FY 2009. Overall, many state agency budgets are 20 to 30 percent less than their budgets in FY 2009.

Education funding continues to make up more than 51 percent of the state budget, with challenges in funding growth evident in some areas. For example, the FY 2013 budget fully funds student growth within the Department of Education (K-12), yet partially funds student growth within the Board of Regents (University System of Georgia).The Department of Education’s budget is $1 billion (12.5 percent) less than it was in FY 2009, while the Board of Regents budget is down more than $450 million (19.9 percent).

The majority of additional funding in the FY 2013 budget is for student enrollment growth, filling shortfalls in Medicaid and the State Health Benefit Plan, and making required payments to the State Employees and Teachers Retirement Plans. The FY 2013 budget also funds implementation of several recommendations from the Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform, including nearly $30 million to fund the third year of the Department of Justice Settlement Agreement for developmental disabilities and mental health consumers, and the Savannah Harbor Deepening Project. Many agencies face additional 2-percent budget cuts, including the Board of Regents which is cut by $35 million for personal services and operating expenses.

Even with moderate revenue growth, Georgia faces a structural deficit. In fact, Gov. Deal projects a $319-million deficit in FY 2014. Any additional tax cuts, currently mentioned as part of the Competitiveness Initiative will only increase the deficit. Without a significant improvement in the economy or tax reform that results in increased revenues, Georgia will continue to struggle to provide services to Georgians most affected by the recession. The state will also find it challenging to make the investments necessary for Georgia to prosper economically.

A balanced and targeted approach, one that includes additional revenues, would allow Georgia to position itself to prosper as the economy recovers, rather than relying on cutting prior investments and underfunding public resources such as schools and roads that are most important for future job growth. Back to top

 Dowload FY 2013 Budget Analyses:

FY 2013 Budget Analysis: Budget Overview

FY 2013 Budget Analysis: PK-12 Education

FY 2013 Budget Analysis: Higher Education

FY 2013 Budget Analysis: Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities

FY 2013 Budget Analysis: Public Health

FY 2013 Budget Analysis: Human Services

 

Fiscal and Tax Policy

SB 203, CAPCO – On Monday, Jan. 23rd, the Georgia Senate voted down SB 203, which if passed would turn the expensive and ineffective CAPCO scheme into law. The bill’s future now looks bleak, but CAPCO could still emerge in either conference committee or an alternative bill. For more details on why CAPCO is unwise policy, see GBPI’s report, CAPCO: A Bad Investment for Georgia.

HB 718 – This proposal would create a new program within the Department of Economic Development – “Invest Georgia” – that would work to increase Georgia businesses’ access to venture capital. As described in our full analysis of the bill, HB 718 appears to be well-designed; however, its expensive price tag means it must be judged within the context of competing state priorities. The House Insurance Committee’s Subcommittee on Administration and Licensing approved bill on 1/24.

Competitiveness Council – Gov. Deal’s Competitiveness Council released its final report this week, laying out a series of recommendations in six areas: business climate, education and workforce, innovation, infrastructure, global commerce and global efficiency. Noteworthy suggestions include removing the energy tax used in manufacturing and “modernizing” certain jobs tax credits. No specific legislation has been filed.

Back to top

 

Drug Testing of Applicants for Public Assistance (TANF, Medicaid and UI)

SB 292 referred to Senate Health & Human Services Committee

HB 464, HB 668, HB 697, HB 698, HB 699 referred to House Judiciary Committee

Several bills have been introduced that require drug testing (mandatory or random) of adult applicants or recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Medicaid, State Unemployment Insurance, and possibly other “state or state-administered federal public assistance.”  The bills generally require the applicant or recipient to pay for the cost of the drug test, which is reimbursed if the test result is negative, using federal funds.

These bills may not be constitutional (e.g., if considered suspicion-less searches) or may not be allowable under current federal law that governs public assistance (e.g., current unemployment law does not allow drug testing). 

So far, the Georgia Department of Human Services has completed a fiscal note for HB 668 with several assumptions that may underestimate the cost. Back to top

HB 718: Well-intentioned, well-designed, and must be paid for

Earlier this month, GBPI released a report evaluating a tax credit proposal called CAPCO that nearly passed the Georgia legislature last year. A poorly-designed piece of “model legislation” with a dismal track record in other states, CAPCO thankfully seems to have lost momentum. Although despite the fact the Senate voted down CAPCO this week, it isn’t technically dead—it could still reemerge in a conference committee later on.

The thing is, CAPCO was supposedly designed to solve a program that’s actually important for Georgia’s lawmakers to address—the state’s lack of a strong venture capital (VC) market. VC is a vital source of financing for entrepreneurs and startup companies, especially those in technology sectors, and there’s evidence to suggest Georgia needs more of it.  Some states have implemented attractive programs to confront similar shortfalls, but in Georgia any discussion of sound “venture capital policy” has been minimal. CAPCO effectively sucked the oxygen from the room.

Until recently that is. A few days after we released our report,we learned that Representative Allen Peake (R-Macon) had an alternative proposal on VC that actually embraces many of the guiding principles we articulated. As we describe in our new analysis of HB 718 , the bills looks to be a thoughtful and well-designed method for pursuing its goal. Modeled heavily on a best practices program in Maryland, the new “Invest Georgia” initiative would be transparent and accountable, entitle Georgia taxpayers to the same returns enjoyed by normal VC investors, and prevent state money from being given away for nothing in return (like CAPCO).

But as with most things, there’s a catch. As written the program would cost $200 million spread over four years, with the fiscal impact rising from $35 million in FY 2014 to $65 million in FY 2017. Given the tight times we’re in, we have to ensure every dollar counts. The proposed program comes on the heels of four years of aggressive budget cuts, with additional cuts to key job creators like technical colleges already included in the FY 2013 budget. Additionally, the governor’s projected shortfall of $320 million for FY 2014 means legislators still have years of tough spending choices ahead of them.

Georgia’s ongoing fiscal crisis demands that any new spending bill, including well-designed ones like HB 718, must be judged within the context of competing priorities. Georgia needs additional VC, sure, but don’t pay for it by cutting from education, job training or other essential investments. Tax expenditures like HB 718 should always be revenue neutral, because otherwise they’re essentially robbing Peter to pay Paul. Georgia’s economy needs new investments in several key areas, ranging from infrastructure to public safety, and we can’t afford them all. The Great Recession and jobless recovery require us to set an especially high bar for choosing where we spend.

There’s a strong case to be made that strengthening Georgia’s VC market could bolster our economy over time, and HB 718 is a well-designed bill based on best practices in other states. Its authors deserve credit. But if lawmakers wish to proceed, they must ensure the program’s paid for by either eliminating other tax breaks on the books or increasing revenue through other means.

 

Related materials:

CAPCO: A Bad Investment for Georgia

Bill Analysis: House Bill 718 (LC 34 3233S)

Georgia moves closer to venture capital investments

Budget review: State’s disinvestment in education undermined economic health of state

Atlanta Journal-Constitution Education Reporter Maureen Downey discusses GBPI’s recent report, FY 2013 Budget Analysis: PK-12 Education. Read full article.

Georgia Lawmaker Introduces Bill to Create Venture Capital Fund

GBPI Policy Analyst Wesley Tharpe is quoted by Amy Hamilton of taxanalysts.com on HB 718. Download full article.

 

Bill Analysis: House Bill 718 (LC 34 3233S) | Venture Capital

In an effort to strengthen the state’s venture capital market, House leaders crafted House Bill 718, a proposal currently before the House Insurance Committee, which calls for the creation of an expensive new tax credit program – deemed “Invest Georgia” – aimed at expanding access to capital for Georgia businesses.

Invest Georgia would cost $200 million over four years, with the fiscal impact increasingly each year between FY 2014-2017.The cost to Georgia taxpayers would be $35 million in FY 2014, $45 million in FY 2015, $55 million in FY 2016 and $65 million in FY 2017.

Download PDF.

 

Related materials:

CAPCO: A Bad Investment for Georgia

Bill Analysis: House Bill 718 (LC 34 3201)

Georgia moves closer to venture capital investments