Education Reform Commission Threatens to Cement in $421 Million Cut

Hover your mouse over the map to view information for each school district.
See how we calculated these numbers by downloading this spreadsheet.

Claire Suggs

Gov. Nathan Deal’s Education Reform Commission is poised to recommend a new school funding formula that threatens to make permanent deep cuts to the existing funding formula and grant programs. The General Assembly must still approve any new formula. But as things stand, most school districts would get less under the proposed formula if it were applied to the current school year than if the Legislature provided the full amount called for in the existing formula. That’s according to preliminary estimates released at the Oct. 28, 2015 meeting of the commission’s funding committee.

The General Assembly appropriated $460 million less for districts this year than the current school funding formula calculated. It also underfunded school transportation grants by $180 million and reduced sparsity grants by $14.5 million. Sparsity grants help districts offset the higher costs of small schools. This is the fourteenth year the legislature imposed cuts to the formula and it’s one reason Georgia now spends far less on each student than most states.

The hardship on school districts worsened in 2012 when the Legislature decided Georgia will no longer cover a portion of health insurance costs for school bus drivers, custodians, food service workers and other essential district staff. Districts now pay the full tab and spend $400 million more annually on health insurance for these employees, local tax dollars that could otherwise be spent in the classroom.

If the new formula was in place this year and fully funded by lawmakers, districts would get $234 million more in state money. That still leaves local school districts a combined $421 million short of what’s called for in today’s formula and grant programs.

Building these cuts into a new funding formula is not smart policy for Georgia’s students. They now compete with students from Massachusetts, New Jersey, Maryland and other states that make strategic, larger investments in education. These investments are particularly critical for low-income students. Georgia is home to many more of these students than leading states. A better alternative to the proposal on the table can be created with a careful assessment of the cost of educating Georgia’s students to the standards the state has set for them. More is expected of students today than any previous generation.

The funding committee is expected to vote on its recommendations when it meets Nov. 12, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m., at the State Capitol in Room 450. The next meeting of the full commission is Nov. 19, 2 p.m. to 4 p.m., in the Sloppy Floyd Building, Suite 824, East Tower. The commission is expected to vote on recommendations from all subcommittees in anticipation of submitting final recommendations to the governor next month.

Read more about the new formula in our report.

Support GBPI Today

The Georgia Budget & Policy Institute is a 501(c)3 organization. We depend on the support of donors like you. Your contribution makes the work that we do possible.

Related Posts

5 thoughts on “Education Reform Commission Threatens to Cement in $421 Million Cut”

  1. When are we going to start focusing on students and having those in the trenches make decisions regarding funding and educational policies? I am so tired of having to put my students needs in the hands of people who don’t truly know what is going on in our schools.

  2. Surely there is enough waste in government to cut somewhere else in the budget.
    Education is so important. It is the way many people can get out of poverty.

  3. This is hugely disappointing and upsetting when Georgia still has a lot more to catch up in the area of education as of now. Instead of reducing class sizes and providing sufficient funds in education, the number one key factor for our future, GA is reducing the budget significantly?! On the same day, Georgia is named Top Business Climate by Site Selection, but then where is the benefit of attracting businesses?

  4. This is so disappointing. Nathan Deal ran on increased funding for education. Looks like the “wing nuts” win over our children.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to our Newsletter